June 18, 2021

Comparing patient-reported impact of COVID-19 shelter-in-place policies and access to containment and mitigation strategies, overall and in vulnerable populations

Page last updated October 29, 2025

Study Website: COVID-19 Citizen Science
ClinicalTrials.gov#: NCT05548803
Study Design: Prospective Observational Study
PCORnet Infrastructure: Common Data Model (CDM), Single IRB, Patient partners or engagement
Principal Investigator: Mark Pletcher
Institution: University of California, San Francisco
PCORnet® Network Partner: REACHnet
Funder: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); (project webpage)
Funding Date: 2020
Study Duration: 2020 – 2023
Participating PCORnet® Clinical Research Networks: GPC, INSIGHT, REACHnet
Therapeutic Area: Infectious Disease
Condition: COVID-19
Age Range: 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Status: Completed

Research Question(s):

  1. What is the comparative impact of different shelter-in-place/reopening policies, overall and in vulnerable populations, on patient-reported financial insecurity, mental health, and other subjective outcomes important to patients?
  2. What is the comparative effectiveness of county-level containment and mitigation strategies at achieving timely access to testing, healthcare, information, and contact tracing, overall and in vulnerable populations?
  3. What is the comparative accuracy of different algorithms designed to predict risk of infection and severe COVID-19 among patients with symptoms, overall and in vulnerable populations?

Primary Publication(s):

Beatty AL, Peyser ND, Butcher XE, et al. The COVID-19 citizen science study: protocol for a longitudinal digital health cohort. JMIR Res Protoc, 2021; 10(8):e28169. doi:10.2196/28169